Click here to return to the DTMBA main page

The Research:

PERCEPTION:   Aluminum bats are more dangerous than wood bats.

REALITY:    The National Consumer Product Safety Commission studied this issue and concluded in 2002 that there is no evidence to suggest that aluminum bats pose any greater risk than wood bats. Multiple amateur baseball governing bodies, including the NCAA, National High School Federation, Little League International, PONY Baseball. All track safety statistics and have concluded that aluminum bats do not pose a safety risk.

PERCEPTION:   Balls come off aluminum bats faster than wood.

REALITY:   Since 2003, metal bats used in high schools have been scientifically regulated so that the speed of batted balls off metal bats is comparable to the speed of a ball hit off the best major league wood bats.  This standard has been adopted by the NCAA and the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) and ensures that aluminum bats do not hit the ball any harder than the best wood bats.

Quick Links:
Frequently Asked Questions
Aluminum Bat Fact Sheet
History of Aluminum Bats
Baseball Bat Science
Independent Assesments
Little League Statement on Non-wood Bats
Significant Changes Made to Bat, Helmet Rules
Related News Articles and Media Clips

PERCEPTION:   Injuries from aluminum bats are more severe than with wood bats.

REALITY:    Two out of the three deaths from a batted ball in the last decade came from wood bats. Dr. Frederick Mueller, Director of the National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury Research, has indicated from his studies that catastrophic injuries from wood bats may be more severe than from aluminum bats.

PERCEPTION:   The Brown University study proves that aluminum bats hit the ball harder than wood bats.

REALITY:    This study is irrelevant by today’s standards. All of the bats used in the Brown study would not be allowed to be used today, because they do not meet the BESR standard. In fact, the author of the study, Dr. Richard Greenwald, said in a federal court declaration that the research in the 2002 study was on bats “which predated current NCAA and high school regulations on metal bats.”  Greenwald also said that “eyewitness observations don’t provide a scientific or reliable comparison between wood and aluminum batted ball velocities.”

Stephen Keener, President and Chief Operating Officer of Little League International and member of the Don’t Take My Bat Away coalition, issued the following statement after reviewing Greenwald’s declaration:
 
“Dr. Greenwald’s statement means the Brown study is obsolete, because it tested bats that would be illegal today.  Using the Brown Study today is like citing a car-safety study that dates back to the time before seat belts became mandatory.  The fact is we have stronger rules in place today and injuries from batted balls are dropping.

PERCEPTION:   The use of aluminum bats places children at an unacceptable risk of injury.

REALITY:    A study from the National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury Research shows that there have been only 15 catastrophic batted ball injuries to pitchers out of more than 9,500,000 high school and college participants since 1982.

During the last five years a number of states, individual organizations, city councils, and others have proposed the banning of aluminum baseball bats on a number of different levels.  These actions have typically been in reaction to a catastrophic injury as opposed to being based on creditable injury data or research.

In May of 2002 the Consumer Product Safety Commission stated, “The Commission is not aware of any information that injuries produced by balls batted with non-wood bats are more severe than those involving wood bats”.  This statement was true in 2002 and it is true in 2007.

The Medical/Safety Advisory Committee of USA Baseball was initiated due to the lack of injury data needed to make decisions affecting the safety of baseball participants. Prior to 2005 there has not been significant research comparing injuries to baseball pitchers from aluminum bats versus wood bats.  In 2005 the USA Baseball Medical/Safety Committee initiated a three year research project comparing line drive baseball injuries to pitchers from aluminum bats and wood bats.  Aluminum bat injury data were taken from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Injury Surveillance System and wood bat injury data collected from college summer leagues (NCAA recognized college summer league teams all use wood bats).

After two years (2005 and 2006) of collecting batted ball injury data to the pitcher from 93 NCAA college baseball teams and 246 college summer league teams, there have only been 17 injuries to NCAA college pitchers and 15 injuries to college summer league pitchers.  There were only 32 injuries after 331,821 balls were hit into play.  The injuries in the summer leagues, using wood bats, were more severe than the NCAA injuries using aluminum bats.  One-third of the summer league injuries involved the head and face as opposed to none in the NCAA.  The third year of the study will be completed in 2007.

 
Click here to email DTMBA